News & Insights
We’re Making History in Real Time.
Our timely insights share informed perspectives on the rapidly evolving story of Election Technology, as it unfolds.
Prioritizing People in Election Infrastructure Procurement
In multiple states, investigations have found that wasteful spending, conflicts of interest, and other issues otherwise addressed directly by federal regulations, were prevalent in procurements for election infrastructure. There is a solution for this as Dennis Mema of our Government Relations team recently wrote in the ABA Journal of Public Contracts Law…
Election Truths and Trustworthy Agents
In my last two posts, I wrote about the problem of falsehood-prone (a.k.a. lying) Chatbots giving out bad information on elections, and about dodgy chatbots that specifically refuse to say anything about elections and other specific hot topics. I answered some who/what/why questions and ended with the question of “What would be better?” This time, I offer a more complete answer...
Who Should Make an Elections AI Service Agent? (Part 6)
In this final installment of how to build an NLA (a domain-specific or DS-NLA) — the how informing the who question (that we started with back in mid-Dec ‘23) — I focus on what may be the most overlooked set of questions about how a system should be built — not just for serving users, but supporting it’s operators…
Who Should Make an Elections AI Service Agent? (Part 5)
In the previous (4th) installment in this series, we pivoted from the question of who can or should build Chatbots, to the challenge of How to build a safe, low-tolerance, domain-specific natural language agent (NLA or “DS-NLA”). This time, we assume for the moment that challenge is tractable and explore the question, “What else is required, in addition to a safe base model?”…
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 4)
After an extended holiday break from my last installment on the question: “Who should make a Chatbot for voters?” — I’m back for the 4th installment in this series. This time, I’m pivoting from the Who question to the How question; and I have definitely pivoted from “Chatbot” to “domain-specific natural language agent” (NLA)…
2024: Faith In The Future of Democracy
As I observed last year on the eve of 2023, now on the eve of 2024, faith in the future of democracy is something that has been tested in recent years, as we have witnessed some otherwise patriotic Americans struggle with their waning faith in democratic systems. Despite this, we can still have faith in the future of democracy as long as we remain committed…
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 3)
After two installments on the question: “Who should make a Chatbot for voters?” — we’ve come down to 3 observations:
Elections is an area of very low tolerance for inaccuracies, hallucinations, and repeating falsehoods.
It’s a terrible idea to build a so-called “lightweight Chatbot” app on top of the existing services powered by current LLMs from the AI tech-titans.
It’s not a good idea for any of those tech-titans to use their expertise and resources to tinker with their own LLM to be a specialized info service.
So then, given what needs to be built, we can finally consider who in the hec can (or should)…
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot? (Part 2)
In the previous installment of this series, I gave a simple answer of “Nobody!” to the question of who should build a voter Chatbot. The reason was simple: the typical Chatbot is equally simple — and fatally flawed: a thin veneer of web (or App) user interface on top of an application programming interface (API) that connects over the Internet to a massive computing complex run by tech titans. and that’s only the beginning of the challenges…
Who Should Make a Voter AI Chatbot?
One of the side effects of the AI frenzy this past year is that lots of people are talking about the idea of having an AI-powered ChatBot for their favorite thing. Election-land is not immune to this desire. Like everywhere else, the idea is more-or-less similar: “Wouldn’t it be great if we could wave a magic wand and have an Oracle appear that is safe and reliable to answer any question about my favorite topic?” Well as the old saying goes, “Not so fast there, my friend”…
Towards an AI Research Agenda for Elections and Beyond (Part 3)
This is the 3rd of three posts of a 4-part series on responsible domain-specific AI research. Last time, John posted his 2nd part of this longer commentary about the AI research agenda that’s necessary for elections specifically, and a lot of government usage generally. Having explained the particular needs of use in election administration, this time he offers clarity about the needs for government computing and/or public-benefit generally.…
Towards an AI Research Agenda for Elections and Beyond (Part 2)
This is the 2nd of three posts of a 4-part series on responsible domain-specific AI research. Last time, John focused on a couple of prerequisite points relevant to the general idea. This time he delves more acutely into AI-driven “domain specific” natural language agents (NLAs), starting with usage in elections…
Towards an AI Research Agenda for Elections and Beyond (Part 1)
In this, first of three posts of a 4-part series, CTO John Sebes examines the AI needs in election technology. He focuses his remarks on text-based generative AI, the technology behind “chat-bots” and other kinds of natural language agents (NLAs). There’s plenty to say about AI more broadly, but NL AI is the tech that can meet important needs in human assistance, specifically NLAs that are “domain specific”…
Will Election Reform In Arizona Prevent A 2024 Meltdown?
Three Arizona counties have attracted considerable attention from news media: Cochise County, Mohave County, and Maricopa County. Each county has had their share of election drama; some played out in the Courts, others played out in tense county Board of Supervisors meetings. All involved agree that the current state of election administration policy and best practices need reform, but that’s where consensus stops. Election reform is a precarious undertaking under ideal conditions. And history has taught that resolving one problem can unintentionally create exponentially larger problems in other areas, along with hefty price tags…
On Our Nation’s 247th Birthday
As we celebrate another July 4th, we thought it fitting to remind ourselves and you are valued readers that nothing can replace reading the original words that shaped our nation’s founding. So, today we offer the Declaration of Independence, in its entirety from the source itself, our National Archives…
De-Weaponizing Voter Registration News
Settling into my new role here as a senior strategic advisor, I noticed a press release from the good folks in Nevada last week regarding what some might characterize as either interesting, concerning, suspicious or a nothing-burger about voter registration statistics post-midterms. Anticipating that some mendacious minds may try to weaponize that, I have some thoughts…
2023: Faith In The Future of Democracy
Faith in the future of democracy is something that has been tested in recent years, as we have seen many otherwise patriotic Americans struggle with their waning faith in democratic systems. Despite this, we can still have faith in the future of democracy as long as we remain committed…
Mistakes Are Not Malfeasance – It’s Important to Know the Difference
In the current polarized environment, every hiccup and anomaly in how elections are being run is potentially a reason for partisans on both sides to allege “fraud,” “suppression,” or similar claims. Needless to say, all of those conditions are corrosive to democracy, and they need to be rooted out whenever they occur. Concerns about these issues can’t simply be dismissed. On the other hand, responding to every error in election administration as evidence of malfeasance also carries very real risks…
Manufactured Chaos
With the midterms in less than 14-days, the level of “noise” in the country is reaching a fever pitch. Partisan actors are sowing doubt about the legitimacy of elections through mis- and disinformation across multiple platforms. When confusion and persistent falsehoods seep into the minds of average voters, they not only threaten the public’s trust in elections, but democracy itself….
Observing International Day of Democracy 2022
The goal of International Day of Democracy is to promote and uphold the principles of democracy. Democracy, at its simplest definition, refers to a government ruled by the people through representatives that have been elected by the whole population. Today is the annual day of observance; our co-founder & COO offers some reflections…
2022 Copenhagen Democracy Summit Recap
This year, the OSET Institute was honored and humbled to receive five invitations to the 5th Copenhagen Democracy Summit, which took place on the 9th and 10th of June in Copenhagen Denmark. It was a remarkable event for which we were honored to attend, participate, co-host a side-meeting, and serve as a co-sponsor...